Literature Review: My research is on how to make refugee/immigrant life better in the US and what is being done already to make it better. 3500-5000 words, Single spaced, 3-4 sub-topics, Chicago auth

f2 3 F in al L it e ra tu re R evie w Le ve ls o f A ch ie ve me nt Crit eria Pro Co mpet en t No vice In tro d u ctio n 45 t o 5 0 p oin ts P ro vide s a 2 -4 pa ra gra ph in tr o du ctio n o f t h e u mbr ella t o pi c th at in cl ude s r e le va n t a n d re ce nt ci ta tio n s a n d clearly in di ca te s w hy t h e 3 -4 s u bt opi cs h ave be en ch ose n , in co rpo ra te s f e edba ck fr o m 40 t o 4 4.5 p oin ts P ro vide s a t le ast a t w o pa ra gra ph in tr o du ctio n t o t h e u mbr ella t o pi c, bu t mo re w ork co uld be do ne in pr ovidi ng r e le va n t a n d re ce nt r e fe re n ce s a n d arg u in g f o r w hy t h ose pa rticu la r su bt opi cs h ave be en ch ose n 0 t o 3 9 p oin ts M is sin g o r in e th e lit e ra tu re r e vie w S u bto p ic s 135 t o 1 50 p oin ts P ro vide s a s tr o n g o ve rv ie w o f 3 -4 s u bt opi cs w it h in t h e u mbr ella t o pi c; each a re a is e qu ally de ve lo pe d (r o u gh ly t h e s a me le n gth ) a n d in cl ude s r e ce nt s o u rce s; e ach s e ct io n is o rg a n iz e d in to s ch ola rly co nve rs a tio n s, r a th er t h an in cl udi ng e xte n siv e di scu ssio n o f o n e in di vidu al s o u rce , in co rpo ra te s f e edba ck fr o m 120 t o 1 34 p oin ts In cl ude s a n o ve rv ie w o f t h re e s u bt opi cs , mo re w ork is n eede d in de o rg a n iz in g in t e rms o f s ch ola rly co nve rs a tio n s, r a th er t h an su mma rie s o f in di vidu al s o u rce s. 0 t o 1 19 p oin ts M ore w ork is n eede d in de a ppr opr ia te s u b org a n iz a tio n in to s ch ola rly co nve rs a tio n s Ch icago A uth or- D ate Cit atio n Pra ctic e 45 t o 5 0 p oin ts U se s co rre ct C hica go A uth or-D ate in -t e xt ci ta tio n pr act ice f o r a ll 1 8 s o u rce s a n d bi blio gra ph y is co rre ct ly f o rma tte d. 8 t o 8 .5 p oin ts U se s co rre ct C hica go A uth or-D ate in -t e xt ci ta tio n a n d at le ast 1 5 so u rce s in t h e bi blio gra ph y a re co rre ct . 0 t o 7 .5 p oin ts S ig n i an d/ or mi ssin g bi blio gra ph y Mec han ic s 45 t o 5 0 p oin ts S in gle -s pa ced, 3 500-5 000 w ords , a t le ast 1 8 s o u rce s, n o co py e di tin g e rro rs , s tr o n g org a n iz a tio n a n d clear w rit in g t h ro u gh ou t, p ara gra ph s a re r o u gh ly t h e s a me le n gth (in di ca tin g e ach ide a h as be en de ve lo pe d mo re o r le ss t o t h e s a me e xte n t) 1 6 t o 1 7.5 p oin ts A t le ast 3 400 w ords , lit tle t o n o co pye di tin g e rro rs , cl early w rit te n bu t o rg a n iz a tio n o r o ve rv ie w o f s o u rce s co uld be mo re e 0 t o 1 6 p oin ts U nde r 3 400 w ords , s ig n i in co pye di tin g o r o rg a n iz a tio n o f so u rce s Co nclu sio n 45 t o 5 0 p oin ts P ro vide s a n e h ig h lig h ts h ow t h e t h re e s u bt opi cs s pe ak to t h e o ve ra ll s ta te a n d dire ct io n o f t h e (u mbr ella t o pi c). 40 t o 4 4.5 p oin ts In cl ude s a co ncl usio n t h at a tte mpt s t o s y n th esiz e t h e lit r e vie w a n d co nnect it t o t h e u mbr ella t o pi c. 0 t o 3 9 p oin ts M is sin g, o ve rly s h ort, o r in e co ncl usio n . N ame D escr ipt io n R ubr ic Deta il V ie w A sso ci ate d It e ms Prin t C lo se W in do w